Legal Opinion

City of Hollywood v. Hakanson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 2004No. 4D02-4674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Gary Hakanson, former risk manager for the city of Hollywood, obtained a declaratory judgment against the city. The judgment established that Frank Yamout, president of the Hollywood civil service board, to which Hakanson filed an appeal after his employment was terminated, had received an undisclosed ex-parte communication which triggered a presumption of prejudice pursuant to section 286.0115, Florida Statutes. We reverse.

Section 286.0115, Florida Statutes, requires public officials to disclose ex-parte communications in order to assure an adverse party the opportunity to confront, respond,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Citizens of the State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API