Smithfield Foods, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.
This negligence action against Defendant United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA” or the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., arises from a five-day fire at Plaintiff Patrick Cudahy, Incorporated (“Patrick Cudahy”) in Cudahy, Wisconsin. The fire was ignited by a military flare stolen from a California military base.1
The Plaintiffs, Patrick Cudahy, Smith-field Foods (“Smithfield”) — Patrick Cu-dahy’s parent corporation, and Smithfield’s six insurers listed above, allege that the Navy owed a duty to the public, including…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Delaboin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023