Legal Opinion

Smithfield Foods, Inc. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 18, 2014No. Case No. 13-C-651PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.

This negligence action against Defendant United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA” or the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., arises from a five-day fire at Plaintiff Patrick Cudahy, Incorporated (“Patrick Cudahy”) in Cudahy, Wisconsin. The fire was ignited by a military flare stolen from a California military base.1

The Plaintiffs, Patrick Cudahy, Smith-field Foods (“Smithfield”) — Patrick Cu-dahy’s parent corporation, and Smithfield’s six insurers listed above, allege that the Navy owed a duty to the public, including…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Delaboin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API