Legal Opinion

France v. France

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Helen France against Henry H. France. From a judgment for plaintiff entered on a decision of the court without a jury (77 N. Y. Supp. 1015), defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

This action is brought to recover past-due installments of money adjudged to plaintiff in a decree of divorce obtained by the defendant in North Dakota for the support and maintenance of plaintiff and a minor child, and also promised in a written instrument executed by the husband in North Dakota on the day the decree of divorce was granted. The facts on the trial of this action were agreed upon by counsel for the respective parties, and, so far as the questions which must be decisive of the rights of the plaintiff to a recovery is concerned, are as follows: The plaintiff and defendant were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Kinnier v. . KinnierNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Shumway v. StillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Lynde v. . LyndeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Kilborn v. FieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  2. Spreckels v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  3. Plant v. PlantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Bloom v. BloomAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API