Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co. v. Phoenix Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the necessity of construing several provisions and definitions in an insurance policy.
Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship and inasmuch as the insurance policy was apparently executed in Illinois, Illinois law governs and apparently was applied by the district court, but we reconfirm Judge Cummings’ request in Carboline Company v. Home Indemnity Company, 522 F.2d 363, 368 (7th Cir. 1975) that “[i]t would be helpful to this Court in the future if the district courts in diversity eases would include a determination of the applicable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Hamilton Die Cast, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Haugan v. Home Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Schweigert v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Holter v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Olympic, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co. of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Gulf Insurance Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Ludwig Candy Co. v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Indiana Insurance Company v. Patricia Kopetsky, and KB Home Indiana Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.