Legal Opinion
Huasteca Petroleum Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1926No. 7695PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on a motion for an order vacating and setting aside the notice, dated April 23, 1926, of taking the deposition of George C. Dow, of the city of Ancon, Canal Zone, on May 25, 1926.
Section 863, United States Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1472), provides for the taking of depositions de bene esse, and so much thereof as is necessary for consideration on this motion reads as follows:
“See. 863. Depositions de bene esse. The testimony of any witness may be taken in any civil cause depending in a district or circuit court by deposition de…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Bird v. HalsyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1898
- The AlexandraDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1900
- Wells v. Oregon & C. Ry. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1883
- Compania Azucarera Cubana v. IngrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Transport Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Otis McAllister & Co. v. The S.S. MarchoveletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Ktistakis v. The Liberian S.S. StarDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958