Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Oljar

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1988No. 87-360PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Ethel Hanson appeals an Eighteenth Judicial District Court judgment in favor of Mary Oljar and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The District Court found that Ethel Hanson had executed a valid release of all claims relating to an automobile accident and that she was bound by the settlement teftns. We affirm.

Ethel Hanson (Hanson) and Mary Oljar (Oljar) were involved in an automobile accident in Bozeman, Montana, on May 8, 1985. Oljar’s vehicle struck Hanson’s vehicle while Hanson was stopped at an intersection. Both parties were insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westfall v. Motors Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kussler v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McCloskey v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Walker v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In re B.T.Montana Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hetherington v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rich v. EllingsonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Carlson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1999
  4. Chwialkowski v. SachsNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mears v. Safeco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API