Legal Opinion

United States Consolidated Seeded Raisin Co. v. Phœnix Raisin Seeding & Packing Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided August 3, 1903No. 12,806PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, District Judge.

While this is an action for the infringement of letters patent, the question of infringement is eliminated from discussion because of a ruling by the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit concerning the same patent in another case.

This action turns upon a question of jurisdiction, resulting from the act of Congress approved March 3, 1897 (29 Stat. 695, c. 395 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 588, 589]), entitled “An act defining the jurisdiction of United States Circuit Courts in cases brought for the infringement of letters patent,” which contains the following, among…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Interior Construction & Improvement Co. v. GibneySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Stanley Electric Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  3. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Philadelphia Pneumatic Tool Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  4. Streat v. American Rubber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Expansion Bolt Co. v. H. G. Kroncke Hardware Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1914
  2. Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1911
  3. Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co. v. De LavaudDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1918
  4. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
  5. Aeration Processes, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API