Legal Opinion
In re Pikna
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 24, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by the Second Judicial Department on October 24, 1973 and has maintained offices in this department during the periods referred to herein. In this proceeding to discipline him, petitioner moves for an order directing that respondent be suspended as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, until such time as the matters herein are concluded and until further order of this court. The motion is granted.
Respondent is charged with professional misconduct, in that he failed to cooperate with the Departmental…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re NueyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re SpiegelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In Re SaghirDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re WisemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984