Cousineau v. ITT Royal Electric
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY, Justice.
This is an appeal by an employee from a decree of the appellate commission denying and dismissing his petition seeking compensation benefits for a double hernia. We concur with the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (commission) findings of fact and affirm the judgment of the appellate commission.
In his original petition, employee Roger Cousineau, claimed that he had suffered a hernia as a result of “handling” copper wheels, that is, lifting and rolling reels of copper wire as required by his employment as an intermediate wire operator at ITT Royal Electric.1 Although…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beauchesne v. David London & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Knowlton v. Porter Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- United Wire & Supply Corp. v. FrenierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
- Bissonnette v. Federal Dairy Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Mazzarella v. ITT Royal Electric DivisionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Monticelli v. Trifari, Krussman & Fishel, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Simon v. Health-Tex, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986