Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Beren
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShalleck, J.
This is an action to recover the sum of $256.74 for earned premium on a policy of insurance issued by the plaintiff to the defendant. The policy was canceled by the plaintiff for non-payment of premium after it had been in force for eight months. The defendant pleads payment as an affirmative defense and counterclaims for the return of the unearned premium of $130.70.
Perrin, Bruckmann Agency, Inc. was the general agent for the plaintiff. Frank Edelson & Co. was a broker conducting a general insurance business. The defendant directed his broker, Frank *298Edelson & Co., to obtain insurance on an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walsh v. . Hartford Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Post & Dowding v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- Northrup v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Northrup v. . PizaNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Condon v. Exton-Hall Brokerage & Vessel AgencyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Bobowski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950