Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 2001No. 914, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

SONNER, Judge.

Kai Ruchell Lee appeals his conviction for possession with the intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, and alleges, as a basis for reversal, that the warranted search of his home by police without knocking and announcing violated his constitutional guarantee to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Lee principally relies upon Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385, 117 S.Ct. 1416, 137 L.Ed.2d 615 (1997), the case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the “knock and announce” provision of the common law is a part of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Dashiell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API