Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Auburn School District
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to compel a hoard of school trustees to issue its warrant for the balance due on a contract for the construction of a school building. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandate. It appears from the petition that, on March 29,1915, defendant entered into a written contract with plaintiff’s testate, by which he agreed to furnish the materials and erect for defendant a school building for the agreed price of $35,725; that before entering upon the performance of said work the said Hayes filed with defendant a good and sufficient bond in a sum not less than one-half the total amount payable by the terms of said contract, which said bond was duly executed, filed, and approved according to the requirements of the act approved May 1, 1911 [Stats. 1911, p. 1422],…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- First Nat'l Bank of Bridgeport v. Perris Irrigation Dist.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Miles v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. OAK GROVE UNION SCH. DIST. OF SONOMA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Silberstein v. KitrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917