Legal Opinion

Unted States v. Jose

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

Decided October 12, 1894No. 257PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This was a proceeding against Tilomas Jose .for an alleged contempt in interfering with property in the possession of the court’s receivers.

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

At the instance of the receivers of this court, in charge of the business and property of the Meal tie, hake Shore & Eastern Railway Company, the defendant has been arrested and brought before the court to answer a charge of. contempt alleged to have been committed by him, in this: That on or about the 14th day of August, last, said defendant unlawfully, willfully, and clandestinely wrested from the xiossession of said receivers, and removed out of the jurisdiction of this court, a raft of saw logs which were theretofore in the lawful possession of said receivers. The…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. ClancyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Bullock Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Raymor Ballroom Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Ex Parte LandryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API