Legal Opinion

Trustees of the New Castle Common v. Gordy

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 4, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The question certified concerns the power of Trustees of the New Castle Common, a corporation administering a charitable trust, to sell and convey certain land constituting a part of the •corpus of the trust. The sole parties to the cause below are the corporation and the persons that have contracted to buy the land.

It is the general rule that in any suit involving the existence or administration of a charitable trust the Attorney General is usually a necessary party.

In Story’s Equity Pleadings, Sec. 222, it is said:

“Hitherto we have spoken of cases, where private persons only are interested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Rolfe & Rumford Asylum v. LefebreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
  3. Attorney-General ex rel. Abbot v. Town of DublinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1859
  4. Orford Union Congregational Society v. West Congregational Society of OrfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pruner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Trustees of the New Castle Common v. GordySupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Carlisle v. Delaware Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  4. Scott v. KaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API