Legal Opinion
Purvis v. Holiday Hills Property Owners Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1982No. 64249PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Summary Judgment. James and Martha Purvis are husband and wife. They have resided in the Holiday Hills residential development since 1970. The Purvises have been members of the Holiday Hills Property Owners Association, Inc. since moving into the development. Mrs. Purvis regularly utilized the recreational facilities of the development and during the summer season used a small and a large swimming pool. Usually the large pool was open only on weekends (Saturdays and Sundays) and Mrs. Purvis used the small pool on other occasions. Though her frequency of use varied from week to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Rogers v. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Auerbach v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Tolliver v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
3Cited by13 opinions
- Louise Evans v. Mathis Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Shackelford v. DeKalb Farmer's Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Garnett v. MathisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Stouffer Corp. v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Harris v. Star Service & Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.