Legal Opinion
State v. Lacoshus
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 3, 1950No. 3832PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
In view of the fact that the defendant Locoshus was not present at the time the girl was taken from the school grounds in Manchester and did not join her and Daigle until evening of that day of August 9 in Boston, the charges against the two defendants will be treated separately. The case of Henry Daigle will be considered first.
In Petition of Morin, 95 N. H. 518, this court held that Elaine Morin was legally committed to the custody of the State Industrial School. No claim is made that the consent of those in charge of the school was obtained for her leaving on the morning of August 9, or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. EdenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- State v. SuennenIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. MetcalfOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. RiversSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Van Metre v. MitchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1853
3Cited by10 opinions
- Agresti v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- State v. EtzweilerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. JansenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.