Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1969No. 173PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Convicted of kidnaping, defendant appeals. The issues are: (1) The intent required under our kidnaping statute, (2) sufficiency of the evidence, (3) identification of defendant and (4) inquiry into a prior conviction.(1) The intent required under our kidnaping statute.

Section 40A-4-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (repl. vol. 6, 1964) states in part:

“Kidnaping is the unlawful taking, restraining or confining of a person, by force or deception, with intent that the victim be held for ransom, as a hostage, confined against his will, or to be held to service against the victim’s will."…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. VialpandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API