United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.

CECIL, District Judge.

Counsel on behalf of the defendant, New Wrinkle, Inc., submitted a series of twelve requests for admissions to the plaintiff, United States of America. Plaintiff made answer to all of the requests except Nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10. To these requests objections were made. These objections are now before the court for determination.

An examination of requests 7, 8, 9 and 10 discloses that they contain requests for a statement of facts rather than a statement of fact for admission or denial.

Rule 36(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., provides for requests for…