Legal Opinion

Haas v. Ruston

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1895No. 1,435PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court. Statement of Case. The appellant was the plaintiff and the appellees were the defendants in the circuit court.

Read the full summary

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court. Statement of Case. The appellant was the plaintiff and the appellees were the defendants in the circuit court. The complaint alleges that the defendants are partners doing business under the firm name of the Melrose Milling Company at Evansville, Indiana, and engaged in the manufacture and sale of flour; that the plaintiff is a resident of the city of Savannah, in the State of Georgia, and that for several years prior to the grievances complained of he had acted as a broker for the defendants at the city of Savannah in the sale of flour manufactured by…

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

It is apparent from the rulings made, and the judgment rendered, that the court below, from the facts alleged in the pleadings, reached these legal conclusions: (1) That the broker had no power to make contracts in his own name and without the knowledge or consent of his principals, which would be binding upon them in favor of the other contracting parties; (2) that as the broker had made contracts which were capable of being enforced by his principals, the principals were liable to him for his commissions; (3) that the circular letter of July 20th relating to the confirmation of sales was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Knapp v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Saveland v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. White v. ChouteauNew York Supreme Court · 1850

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Boswell Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Meridian Mortg. Co., Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Abicht v. SearlsIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Bennett v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Johnson v. SchrepfermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API