Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United Artists Corp. & L.P.A.A., Marcello Danon v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1985No. 83-6234Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result reached in Judge Hall’s opinion. Indeed, if we had jurisdiction, I could agree with it entirely. I respectfully dissent, however, from the holding that we have appellate jurisdiction over Danon’s appeal under an equitable exception to rule 4(a)(5), Fed.R.App.P. I would find no appellate jurisdiction over the appeal from the first order for lack of timeliness, but I would affirm Judge Marshall’s *1272order on the rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., motion for reconsideration.

I

Rule 4(a)(1), Fed.R.App.P., provides that appeals may be taken by nongovernmental parties in civil actions only…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API