Legal Opinion
Shulton, Inc. v. Optel Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 28, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-2925PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POLITAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ in limine motion to consider the appropriate scope of plaintiffs proof of damages at trial. This Court determines that, assuming liability is established at trial, any damage award will be calculated by the difference between the domestic market price and the fraud-induced export price paid by the defendants.
This proceeding was commenced by plaintiff as an action for a permanent injunction and damages arising out of the alleged conspiracy of defendants to defraud plaintiff. Plaintiff, Shulton, Inc.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- B.F. Hirsch v. Enright Refining Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Zeliff v. SabatinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Ford Motor Co. v. B & H SUPPLY, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- GTE Products Corp. v. Broadway Electrical Supply Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997