Legal Opinion
United States v. Rudolph Baker, United States of America v. Roger Pennell
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1979No. 79-5083, 79-5084PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Rudolph C.. Baker and Roger Pennell were each convicted on each count of a five-count indictment charging them with causing a woman to travel in interstate commerce with intent to further the business of prostitution, unlawful under state law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952(a)(3) and 2. 1 They appeal, contending that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury’s verdict on each count and that the district court committed reversible error in charging the jury and in admitting evidence to which objection had been made.
We see no merit in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Roy Braswell ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Frank Nick Zizzo, Alexander Stasnick, Hugo A. Lazzareschi and WalterwojciechowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Charles Holcomb and Ed WallachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Priscilla R. Scott, United States of America v. Stephen Rodger WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Rudolph BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Brinda DefilippisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.