Legal Opinion
HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF CITY OF AUGUSTA v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 8, 1957No. 36895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
In this opinion the plaintiff in error will be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendants in error as the defendants, the parties having occupied that respective relationship in the trial court.
1. The question raised by the plaintiff’s exception to the judgment sustaining the defendant’s, Dora Boyd’s, general demurrer and dismissing the case as to her is whether the petition set forth a cause of action against the demurring defendant.
The action against all of the defendants was instituted under the hospital lien act of 1946, now codified in Code (Ann.) §§ 67-2207—67-2213.
For the sake of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Robinson v. MODERN COACH CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blankenbaker v. JonovichArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Dawson v. Hospital Authority of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Integon Indemnity Corp. v. Henry Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Department of Medical Assistance v. HallmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.