Legal Opinion

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Home Ins. Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 12, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-0669PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORMA HOLLOWAY JOHNSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company moves this Court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed.R.Civ.P.). Defendants, Lilly’s insurers from 1947 to July 15, 1976, vigorously oppose the motion. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, the Court finds that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and Lilly is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment is granted.

BACKGROUND

Eli Lilly is one of several hundred manufacturers of products…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Lighting Fixture and Electric Supply Co. Inc. v. The Continental Insurance Co., and Electric Supply Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  3. Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Ellsworth Associates, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  5. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API