Harris v. Wallace
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Perry Chancery Court; Jordan Sellers, Chancellor; This case is controlled by 118 Ark. 119 and 133 Id. 491. The case in 130 Ark. 44 is conclusive. "The questions here are settled by 125 Ark. 329. See also 202 S. W. 831; 123 Ark. 205; 76 Id. 197; 85 Id. 171; 99 Id. 1; 112 Id. 342; 130 Id. 44. There was no abuse of discretion of the county court in laying out laterals. Here the laterals are moderate in amount.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Perry Chancery Court; Jordan Sellers, Chancellor; This case is controlled by 118 Ark. 119 and 133 Id. 491. The case in 130 Ark. 44 is conclusive. "The questions here are settled by 125 Ark. 329. See also 202 S. W. 831; 123 Ark. 205; 76 Id. 197; 85 Id. 171; 99 Id. 1; 112 Id. 342; 130 Id. 44. There was no abuse of discretion of the county court in laying out laterals. Here the laterals are moderate in amount. Two of the laterals only straighten out the road as sanctioned in 202 S. W. 831.
1Per curiam
Road Improvement District No. 1 of Perry County, one of the appellees, is a road improvement district formed by an order of the county court of Perry County pursuant to Act No. 338 of the General Assembly of 1915 (p. 1400), and the other appellees are commissioners of the district. Appellants own property in the district and instituted this action in the chancery court of Perry County for the purpose of obtaining a decree enjoining the commissioners from proceeding, under an order of the county court, to construct certain lateral roads and extensions not described in the original plans for…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Pritchett v. Road Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Osborne v. SuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Self v. Road Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920