Legal Opinion

Self v. Road Improvement District No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 12, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Greene Chancery Court; Archer Wheatley, Chancellor; Act No. 186, Acts 1919, is void, as it withdrew from the county court jurisdiction to create district No. 1 of Greene County to build road proposed by its plans. The court erred in overruling the demurrer. 130 Ark. 517. 214 S. W. 23 has no bearing on this case. The appellee district was established in strict conformity with law. Act 338, Acts 1915; act 186, Acts 1919; 130 Ark. 507; 214 S. W. 23.

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This action was brought by the appellants against the appellees, to restrain them from constructing the improvement for which Road Improvement District No. 1, of Greene County, Arkansas, hereafter called No. 1, was created.

The following are substantially the allegations of appellants’ complaint': That they were land owners in No. 1; that on May 28, 1919, an order was entered purporting to establish No. 1 by the county court of Greene County under the provisions of act 338 of the Acts- of 1915, commonly known as the Alexander Road Law; that the district proposed to construct a road from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rayder v. WarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Van Dyke v. MackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Pritchett v. Road Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Hout v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Harrison v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green Star Supermarket, Inc. v. StacySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API