Legal Opinion
Barrett Carpet Mills, Inc. And Roy C. Barrett, and the Carpet and Rug Institute, Intervenor-Petitioner v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1980No. 78-1611PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:
The petitioners, Barrett Carpet Mills, Inc. (hereinafter Barrett) and its president, Roy D. Barrett seek review of an order of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) which ruled that the petitioners had violated the Flammable Fabrics Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1191, et seq. by manufacturing and selling carpet that failed to comply with standards established under regulations issued by the Commissioner pursuant to § 1195 of the Act. 16 C.F.R. § 1630.1-.5. Jurisdiction to review is conferred by 15 U.S.C. § 1193(e)(1).
The carpet style involved in the Commission’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Standard Distributors, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Rayex Corporation, a Corporation of the State of New York, Ray Tunkel, Harry Kramer and William Jonas, Petitoners v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Coro, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Danube Carpet Mills, Inc., and Carl D. HagamanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- AMREP Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- AMREP Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986