Legal Opinion
United States v. Danube Carpet Mills, Inc., and Carl D. Hagaman
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 30, 1984No. 82-8456PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, 1 Danube Carpet Mills, Inc. (Danube) and its president, Carl D. Hagaman (Hagaman), appeal from an adverse summary judgment ruling in a civil penalty action instituted under the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1). The government alleged that appellants violated a consent decree that they had entered into with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Appellants and the FTC entered into the agreement pursuant to a FTC investigation of the appellants’ carpet manufacturing operations which revealed nonconformance with the flammability standard,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Robinson v. VollertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Papercraft Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Chevron Oil Company, the California DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Federal Election Commission v. Harvey FurgatchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Consumer Financial Protection v. Gary KloppCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- San Huan New Materials High Tech, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- San Huan New Materials High Tech, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.