State on behalf of Connor H. v. Blake G.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 246 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS not subject to such a challenge. Therefore, Dubray could not show prejudice from counsel’s purported failure to chal- lenge the hospital statement. Thus, I agree with the majority that Dubray has not shown ineffective assistance of counsel regarding his various admissions. Wright, J., joins in this concurrence. State of Nebraska on behalf of Connor H., a minor child, appellee, v. Blake G., appellee, and Amanda H., now known as A manda G., third -party defendant and appellant. In re Change of Name of Connor H., by and through his next friend, A…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bobo v. JewellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Gubernat v. DeremerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Cohee v. CoheeNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- D. R. S. v. R. S. H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Huffman v. FisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.