Legal Opinion

Beaven v. McAnulty

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998No. 98-SC-140-MRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

At issue in this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals properly denied Appellants’ writ of mandamus on grounds that Appellants had an adequate remedy on appeal. We conclude that because the trial court acted beyond its jurisdiction when it transferred the instant case on forum non conve-niens grounds, the writ is an appropriate remedy. Therefore, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the Court of Appeals to enter an order directing the trial couid; to reconsider Appellees’ forum non con-veniens motion in light of this opinion.

The plaintiffs in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  4. Torres v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gore v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wallace Hardware Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Bill Abrams, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Fritsch v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kentucky Labor Cabinet v. GrahamKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. At & T CORP. v. SigalaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API