United States v. William L. Carpenter
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents an issue of first impression for this circuit: Does a defendant’s refusal to testify at criminal proceedings involving co-conspirators preclude him from receiving the benefit of the United States Sentencing Guidelines’ “safety valve” provision? We conclude that it does not.
Congress added the “safety valve” provision to the federal sentencing scheme in the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reform Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). This provision requires district courts to ignore the statutory minimum sentences of specified drug trafficking…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hudson v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4598, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7402 United States of America v. Prakash Man Shrestha, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Sealed Case (Sentencing Guidelines' "Safety Valve")Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Nestor BarronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Lance TobiasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024