Legal Opinion
Hauser v. Van Zile
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 22, 1972No. 71-834PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
269 So.2d 396 (1972)
Carleton E. HAUSER and Betty Jo Hauser, Appellants,
v.
Arthur VAN ZILE, and Angelena Van Zile, His Wife, Jointly and Severally, Appellees.
No. 71-834.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
November 22, 1972.
Thomas A. Bratten, of Campbell, Colbath, Kapner & Bratten, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Evelyn R. Flack of the Law Offices of Ronald Sales, Palm Beach, for appellees.
2Per curiam
The appeal is by the plaintiffs below from a final judgment consequent on an order of the trial court dismissing the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The suit was…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Willis v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Williams v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Klondike, Inc. v. BlairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- McLain v. Pensacola Coach CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Norris Et Ux. v. EikenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Mazzoni Farms, Inc. v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Billian v. Mobil Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Rolls v. Bliss & Nyitray, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Gregg v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.