Rittenhouse Row v. Aspite
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Dominic Aspite and 1420 Chestnut Street Associates (collectively, Aspite) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court), which reversed a decision of the Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) granting his application for a use variance. Aspite questions whether the trial court erred in concluding that he failed to establish a hardship. Discerning no error, we affirm the trial court’s order reversing the ZBA.
At issue is the permitted use of the first floor of a multi-story structure located at 1420-22 Chestnut…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In Re Appeal of Realen Valley Forge Greenes AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. GollaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Isaacs v. Wilkes-Barre City Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pohlig Builders, LLC v. Zoning Hearing Board of Schuylkill TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Oxford Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- A. Swede & S. Swede v. Richland Twp. ZHB & F. CalabretteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- P. Heck v. Worcester Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- R.L. Martin v. Heidelberg Twp. ZHB v. Heidelberg Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.