Legal Opinion

Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Salt

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 7, 2020No. 17-3568Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3568 Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Salt UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. McLeod v. the Jewish Guild for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Robert Moates v. Wayne Barkley, Superintendent at Riverview Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API