Legal Opinion

State v. Bynum

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1984No. 8326SC445PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Guilt Phase

Defendant contends the court erred in denying his request for an instruction that identity of the contraband as heroin was an element of the offense which the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The request was made orally at the end of the charge in response to the court’s inquiry regarding objections or further requests for instructions. It thus was not timely, and whether to grant it was for the court’s discretion. G.S. 15A-1231(a); State v. Coward, 296 N.C. 719, 725, 252 S.E. 2d 712, 716 (1979). The court had instructed on the substance of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. SledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. CowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. ArnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API