Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Louisville Asphalt Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 20, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming-

The appellant, City of Louisville, instituted this suit against the appellee, Louisville Asphalt Company, for the possession of a certain piece of property in Louisville. The City alleged that the property, which was owned by and in the possession of Lizzie E. Jaggers on September 1, 1929, was duly assessed for city taxes; that the necessary steps for the collection of the 1930 taxes were taken; that they were not paid by May 1, 1930, and thereby became delinquent; that on November 4, 1930, the property was offered for sale for taxes and the City…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1895
  2. Heath v. HazelipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Louisville Cooperage Co. v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Williamson v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Hunt-Forbes Construction Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forwood v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. GrabfelderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API