Legal Opinion

Harry Partis v. Miller Equipment Co., Inc., and North & Judd Manufacturing Co., and R. H. Buhrke Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1971No. 20601PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This action arises out of an accident which occurred on October 9, 1964, when plaintiff-appellant was seriously injured. On October 4, 1966 complaint was filed against Miller Equipment Co., Inc., (Miller) which allegedly sold, to plaintiff-appellant’s employer, the safety belt which plaintiff-appellant claims was defective. More than three years after the filing of the original complaint an amended complaint was filed naming North & Judd Manufacturing Co., (North & Judd), and R. H. Buhrke Co., Inc., (Buhrke), as defendants. Defendants-appellees North & Judd and Buhrke filed motions to dismiss…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Helen Chamberlain v. Mrs. Roy E. Lowe, Formerly Miss Eleanor Joy McHollandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  3. Thompson v. HorvathOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Velmohos v. Maren Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Cohn v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  5. Ohio Brass Company v. Allied Products CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API