Legal Opinion
Togut v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A. (In Re Concorde Nopal Agency, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided October 28, 1988No. 18-24370PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Rule 11 Sanctions
THOMAS C. BRITTON, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s motion (CP 20) under B.R. 9011(a), which makes Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. applicable to pleadings and other papers filed in bankruptcy, seeks sanctions against the plaintiff chapter 7 trustee, the bankruptcy estates, and the trustee’s New York attorneys, a law firm with which he is associated, and the attorney of that firm who signed the complaint. 1 His signature is illegible, but he has been identified as the trustee Togut. Plaintiff has moved (CP 27) to strike the motion and has also responded by memorandum (CP 28). The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jacoway v. Anderson (In Re Ozark Restaurant Equipment Co.)District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berger Industries, Inc. v. Artmark Products Corp. (In Re Berger Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Nolden v. Athearn, Chandler & Hoffman (In Re Western Die Casting Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1989