Legal Opinion
BAM PROPERTIES LLC v. CITY OF OROVILLE, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 29, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00041Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BAM PROPERTIES LLC, Case No. 2:26-cv-00041-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 CITY OF OROVILLE, et al., (ECF No. 6) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants City of Oroville, Patrick Piatt, and Richard 18 Stanford’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff BAM Properties LLC’s Complaint.1 (ECF No. 6.) A 19 hearing was held on May 26, 2026. Christopher Moenig appeared as counsel for 20 Plaintiff; Tyler Sherman appeared as counsel for Defendant. (ECF No. 14.) 21…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.