Legal Opinion
Williams v. Verizon Wash., D.C. Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 31, 2018No. 16–cv–0932 (KBJ)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Importantly, it is well established that the nonmoving party must show more than "[t]he mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of [its] position[.]" Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; see also Potter v. District of Columbia , 558 F.3d 542, 549 (D.C. Cir. 2009) ("[M]erely colorable or not significantly probative evidence ... is insufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion." (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) ). Indeed, the nonmovant must present specific facts and evidence that support its allegations and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beberman v. BlinkenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Chan Chan v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Guillen-Perez v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Hamilton v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.