Ingram v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant waived trial by jury on a charge of violating the lottery laws, D. C.Code 1951, §§ 22-1501, 22-1502, 52 Stat. 198-199. She was convicted. She afterwards urged, in support of a motion for a new trial, that her trial counsel “refused to permit her to testify” and failed to introduce certain other testimony. In our opinion the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, and its judgment placing the defendant on probation is
Affirmed.
2Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Kansas City Power & Light Company v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Lee T. Lovallo v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army and Major General John Hightower, Commanding General of Fort Hamilton ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.