Legal Opinion
Ryant v. Bullock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 19, 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weinstein, J.), dated April 24, 2009, as granted the motion of the defendants Shamel Bullock and Adrienne Bullock pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Adir Rent A Car and Georgiana Thompson, which was pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Butindaro v. GrinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mattera v. CapricAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- 115-41 St. Albans Holding Corp. v. Estate of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Solano v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Durr v. New York Community HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by10 opinions
- U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. DorvelusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Pipinias v. J. Sackaris & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Cynan Sheetmetal Products, Inc. v. B.R. Fries & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bank of New York v. KushnirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Fuentes v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.