Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1985No. 09 84 351 CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.'

Two forfeiture cases brought by the State of Texas pursuant to TEX.REV. CIV. ST AT ANN. art. U76-15, secs. 5.03 through 5.08 (Vernon 1976 & Vernon Supp. 1985), were consolidated for trial. On August 29, 1984, judgment of forfeiture was signed and entered by the trial judge. From this judgment defendant below, Robert Bruce Clark, has perfected appeal to this Court.

Point of error number one follows:

“The Court erred in overruling Defendant’s Plea in Bar pursuant to Article 4476-15, Section 5.07(a).”

A hearing date was set within thirty days after defendant’s answer was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schrader v. Artco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. State v. Boren, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1983
  3. Fenno v. Jacobe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. Pickens v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Cardenas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. $435,000.00Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. $4,097 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Lovelace v. DowneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  5. State v. One (1) 1986 Nissan Automobile V.I.N. JN1HZ14S1GX162301Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API