Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Cassidy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

The only error assigned in this appeal is that the trial court erred in charging the jury as follows: “To sustain the will and codicil you should be satisfied by a preponderance of proof upon the whole testimony, taken in connection with the presumption of sanity which exists in favor of every person and which is of probative effect in favor of the will and codicil, that the testatrix, at the time of their execution, possessed testamentary capacity.”

The question first arose upon a motion to set aside the verdict because of this instruction, admittedly erroneous. The trial judge declined to do…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. KimberlySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  4. Wheeler v. RockettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Caschetto v. Silliman Godfrey Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API