Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 3, 1943PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDicteENsoN, J.

This action , was brought under the provisions of General Statutes, Sup. 1941, § 822f, which, under certain prescribed conditions, allows a joinder of several plaintiffs in one action involving rights to relief arising out of the same transaction. The plaintiff’s intestate, Higgins, and the other plaintiff, Jacobson, were employed by the highway department of the state of Connecticut in trimming trees in a public highway of the state. While so engaged Higgins came in contáct with a high tension wire of the defendant and was electrocuted. Jacobson claimed to have suffered an electric shock at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Wray v. Fairfield Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Nolan v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. State v. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API