Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Mattis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 16, 2017No. Civil Action No. 15-0781 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
On May 27, 2015, Gwendolyn D. Pierce filed a lawsuit against defendant James Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense. Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. Plaintiff alleges that she received lower performance evaluations than her peers based on her race, sex, and prior protected activity, and that these poor ratings caused her to receive lower pay in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et. seq. Compl. On June 22, 2016, the Court denied defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Targetsmart Holdings, LLC v. Ghp Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Auris Health, Inc. v. Noah Medical CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Chang v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Embrey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022