Legal Opinion

Croteau v. Harvey & Landers

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1954No. 4312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The main issue here is whether the plaintiff’s motion to reopen was properly granted. The Court by its original decree of July 18, 1951, dismissing the petition “without prejudice to further proceedings under section 38, Laws of 1947,” left it open to the plaintiff to petition for modification of the decree under the above section which, as amended by Laws 1949, c. 277, s. 4, reads as follows: “Upon application of any party in interest upon the ground of change in the conditions, mistake as to nature or extent of injury or disability, fraud, undue influence or coercion, the commissioner of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weymer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daboul v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Brown v. LA FRANCE IND., a DIV. OF RIEGEL TEX.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Merrimack Valley Wood Products, Inc. v. NearSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. State v. GodingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Appeal of ElliottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API