Taylor v. Walston & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
The appellee Walston & Co., Inc., herein called Walston, recovered a judgment against appellant Earnest E. Taylor for damages for conversion of 66 shares of corporate stock. Taylor appeals on two points of error: (1) that appellee is not entitled to recover because of its violation of federal law regulating the securities industry; and (2) that its cause of action is barred by the two year statute of limitation. We affirm.
The essential facts are undisputed. On April 2, 1968 Walston, a securities dealer, at Taylor’s request sold 100 shares of the common stock of Redman…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Ligon v. E. F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Avery v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- In re Naftalin & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pierson v. GFH Financial Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- IFG Leasing Co. v. Ellis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Sharpe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Hoffman v. WallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Goodbody & Company, Inc. v. Charles F. McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.