Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Walston & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1973No. 18189PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellee Walston & Co., Inc., herein called Walston, recovered a judgment against appellant Earnest E. Taylor for damages for conversion of 66 shares of corporate stock. Taylor appeals on two points of error: (1) that appellee is not entitled to recover because of its violation of federal law regulating the securities industry; and (2) that its cause of action is barred by the two year statute of limitation. We affirm.

The essential facts are undisputed. On April 2, 1968 Walston, a securities dealer, at Taylor’s request sold 100 shares of the common stock of Redman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Ligon v. E. F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Avery v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
  5. In re Naftalin & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pierson v. GFH Financial Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. IFG Leasing Co. v. Ellis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Sharpe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Hoffman v. WallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Goodbody & Company, Inc. v. Charles F. McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API