Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin L. Cheatham, United States of America v. Jack P. Cunningham
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1990No. 89-5094, 89-5095PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Martin L. Cheatham and Jack P. Cunningham appeal their convictions on counts of aiding and abetting mail fraud, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1988). Cheatham was convicted on five counts; Cunningham was convicted on twenty-three counts. We affirm.
Cheatham and Cunningham both were employed by “CAN-AM.” CAN-AM refers collectively to three corporations: CAN-AM Development Corp.; CAN-AM Mint and Trading, Ltd.; arid Vets for Vets, Inc. The driving force behind CAN-AM was a man named Michael Crosby. Through its principals and employees, CAN-AM was responsible for the sale…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Timothy Paul Parker, United States of America v. William August ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lloyd E. HumphreysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Martin SigillitoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Gilberto ZuazoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.