Jackson v. Southern Auto Finance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.
Appellant’s car was repossessed and sold, and she filed this class action against the lender, alleging that it failed to comply with the notice requirements of the UCC. The trial court granted the lender’s motion for summary judgment, but we reverse because of the insufficiency of the notice. We also find a settlement offer for the full amount plaintiff sought did not make the class action moot.
The notice provided by the lender failed to include a number of requirements found in section 679.614(l)(a) and section 679.613(1), such as whether the sale was public or private, or where or when the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richard Weiss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Regal Collections Lancer Investments, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Bondurant v. Beard Equipment Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Allstate Indem. Co. v. De La RosaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frazier v. Castle Ford, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Comerica Bank v. MannDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Kaner v. Robert R. Schiffman, D.C., P.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012